First Course on using Figaf IRT to test SAP PI/PO

I have now created the first recording of a course on using Figaf IRT to test your SAP PI/PO system. The goal is to make it easy to understand all the

There will be room for improvement. Probably a lot. But it will be a starting point, and there will be a new revision of it once we get some more features ready to make the SAP PI/PO testing even easier. You can find the videos here.

The videos are free. My goal is to get you to set up the test cases and I believe it is easier with a bit of training. Video will take around 1 hour to watch. I have included slides at the end of the presentation

If you want to install the free version of Figaf IRT for SAP PI you can find it here.

Installation and configuration of IRT

Collecting test data for SAP PI

Running tests on SAP PI with Figaf IRT

Which Enterprise software is easy to learn but also has the complexity?

For my tool to SAP PI/PO testing system, I was asked how much training you need. My thought was one hour, a client said 4 hours. That is a big difference than learning SAP PI/PO that will take days/months.

With all tools, there is the trade-off to make something simple that can do one thing VS something that can do everything. The simple is a Stopwatch app. A complex is a Java framework like Spring that allows you to do everything. And then you have everything in between.

But it got me thinking about how we learn software. You can view the video here

Please share below if you have found any good tools that we can learn from. 

So a good example of a software that is good to use from the gaming world is the simulation games. Here you get information that now clicks this icon, then do this and now you can build a farm. It is a bit frustrating because you cannot explore the application. If they do not have this guide it will be difficult to have users figuring out how to use the system.

I have not seen that strong guides for anything in the Enterprise world. Our installation is taking longer than installing an App from your favorite app store. And probably there are too many steps involved to just discard a project the moment you first run into a problem.

In the SAP world it is also difficult you have SAP ERP and creating a Purchase Order takes some time to learn. I know there are Screen Personas ( or what current name may be) and Fiori that may simplify some of the normal POs created. But it still a different approach and will allow a limited functionality. If users should do something more or create a more complicated PO it cannot be done without a lot of custom development.

Our current approaches to simplify the user experience is:

  • Add a free video course that covers the different scenarios that you would have. So a way to get the user started.
  • We are also working on embedding the documentation tighter into the application.
  • We have tried to make it as simple as possible to set up the test case with the tool.

I’m not sure if we could make some guides that helped people selecting a good interface to start testing with. But there could be some pointers what people should be looking at and for.

Please share if any good ideas to look for ways to get people using complex enterprise software. 

 

IRT 2.0 released you can now test SAP PI/PO for free

Ever since I started with developing SAP PI/PO testing was a big thing. There has not been any tool provided by SAP for it.

Over the last two years, we at Figaf has been working on creating a testing tool for testing SAP PI/PO. We got some customers using it, and it is improving their operations. Both when applying support packs or when checking that their new transports work as expected.

I thrilled to announce that we now support a free version of our testing tool. I guess it is also kind of scary to give away something that has cost this much to develop for free. There is some limitation on this free version but you will be able to test some of your interfaces and ensure they work. You can only test 10 ICO(Integration Objects) and save 100 test cases.

IRT is a tool that allows you to collect messages from your productive SAP PI/PO system and then process them on your development system. This is the fastest way to create a validation that your scenarios work.

See a short demo of IRT below.

It is fairly simple to install and run IRT. Install an SCA file on the SAP PI/PO system, create a user and you are ready to run it.  You can get it working in 1 hour if you got the access required.

Download IRT today and start testing your SAP PI/PO systems.

 

IRT 2.0 Release event. Taking SAP PI/PO Testing to the next level

If I had a big marketing department this invitation would probably look like the unveiling of the new Samsung phone. But since I’m the marketing department it is just some fact. And no cool graphics. I do hope you want to join anyway.

Testing SAP PI/PO is not really fun. It takes way too much time and is challenging. That is the reason I created Figaf IRT. I got the idea for IRT two years and it is time for a new release. We are ready to IRT 2.0 Simpler, Easier and Everywhere.

One of the big challenges has been the deployment of the IRT testing application and the difference between different Java and Netweaver that gave different results. We have therefore spent 3 months planning and rewriting the application to be able to run standalone so customers will be able to run IRT if they have 7.31+.

This enables us to create different models for deployment and license options.

We have a release party on February 8 ( which coincidently also is Daniels birthday).

I will be sharing some of the new features and what it means for licensing models.

You can join by clicking the button below.

And as with all good events, there is a surprise. I’m burning to share this with you also but want to keep the suspense.

How to ensure quality from your SAP consultants

I was talking about the talking about the future of consulting/freelancing at my disruption training. One thing that we got to talk about was recommendations like as on TripAdvisor.

If you are going to hire a consultant or employee (for that matter), you just have to hope that your skills as judging the person are correct. And also their CV is accurate and has the skills to solve your problems. I’m sure there are some are terrific interviewer, but it may be challenging to find the best person for a job.

If you were going to hire me you would make obvious like to see that somebody has said something nice about me. I’m charging a premium rate compared to what is typically requested via requiters.

I have only been hired once where the recruiter asked for references from two previous clients. I’m not sure what is the normal way to be checking what is going on. The way this normally has happened is. I have asked “Hey John, I have a new project going on will you give a reference for me.”
He will then write few words of recommendation. Like “Daniel has been really helpful in our SAP PI project. He has been taking the lead and ensured our systems is update. ”

The problem with such a review is that my clients may like me for the person that I’m and how I’m helping them. The solutions that I’m providing may not be optimal and not live up to the promise that I gave or is telling them. In some cases where I’m helping with skills that are outside their expertise, they will not be able to tell if I did a good job.

There is the third party review as a second approach. Here either I or future clients need to pay another consultant to review the work that I did. He would need same skills as I have to be able to verify what I have done. It would probably to be the most reliable sources of review because it is judging the work.

Though it may have some challenges. How am I suppose to give third party access to what I have done and shown it the best way? In most contracts, I’m not allowed to share confidential data with outsiders. I have made some solutions that are not optimal if you look at them from an end perspective, but there may have been changes during the development that meant we ended up with some crap data.

A solution: Another way could we agree on two rates a normal and one for good work. For the first period, I’m at the standard rate. Then after two-three months, my client get a third party reviewer to go thru the content that I have made. And if it is okay I got the premium rate (paid back for the 3 months) otherwise we go for the normal rate. And the contact may end.
With this latter approach, I’m giving the client some risk reversal to ensure they only pay the premium if I’m really good. And most consultants would be able to wait for it.
The only price for this would be the third party review, which anyway would be an excellent way to ensure that you are making good quality.

I guess the topic of judging Quality will be in a separate post later. Be sure to connect or follow to hear about it.